U.G. Kutsan, THE GEORGY PUKHOV INSTITUTE FOR ENERGY MODELLING THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF UKRAINE
O.V. Godun, V.N. Kyrianchuk, SS "SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL CENTER"
Èlektron. model. 2018, 40(5):111-118
https://doi.org/10.15407/emodel.40.05.111
ABSTRACT
The comparison economy assessment of nuclear energy system based on ÀES-2006 and ÀÐ-1000 and electricity generating by coal power plant realized. The IAEA code NEST used. The initial technical data of nuclear PP and coal PP presented. Assessment was provided accord- ing to IAEA INPRO methodology. The NPP economy attractiveness in Ukraine was obtained.
KEYWORDS
IAEA, NEST, nuclear energy system, modelling, economy.
REFERENCES
- Енергетична стратегія України до 2035 року «Безпека, енергоефективність, конкурентоспроможність». Розпорядження КМУ від 18.08.2017 No. 605-r
- INPRO METHODOLOGY FOR SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT OF NUCLEAR ENERGY SYSTEMS: Vienna: IAEA, 2014, 103 p. (IAEA Nuclear Energy Series. No. NP-T-4.4).
- Schulz L. Westinghouse AP1000 advanced passive plant. Nuclear Engineering and De- sign. 2006, Vol. 236, Issues 14—16, p. 1547—1557.
- Проект АЭС-2006. Основные концептуальные решения на примере Ленинградской АЭС. Атомэнергопроект, 2011.
- INPRO Assessment of the Planned Nuclear Energy System of A Report of the International Project on Innovative Nulcear Reactors and Fuel Cycles (INPRO) IAEA TECDOC ¹ 1716.
- Updated Capital Cost Estimates for Utility Scale Electricity Generating U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Energy Information Administration.
- Nuclear New Build: Insights into Financing and Project OECD. NEA No. 7195, 2015.
- Vogtle Units 3 and Thirteenth Semi-Annual Construction Monitoring Report. Georgia Power. August 2015. No 29849.
- Ñost and Performance data for power generation technologies. Prepared for the National Renewable Energy Black & Veatch Holding Company. February, 2012. [Электорнный ресурс] Режим доступаhttp://refman.energytransitionmodel.com/publications/1921.